I'll just say that your description right there feels rather the descriptions of sexual inverts that were coming into popularity towards the end of the 19th century and into the early 20th. I absolutely don't disagree with the reasoning behind portraying her with some of those elements, and of course one can read these things all sorts of different ways, but to me, it's pretty interesting and allows more than enough room for a queer interpretation.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-15 08:09 am (UTC)