Oh, yeah, that'd be good. I sort of tend to think of sexologists' ideas as applied to queer women really got going a bit later, with people like Ellis, though I guess Ulrichs et al really were talking about both to a certain extent - it just gets more attention as applied to men. (Which then takes us into the tangled realm of the invisibility of female queerness...)
no subject
Date: 2010-05-14 07:13 am (UTC)