Did I read this book differently?

Date: 2010-06-12 09:07 pm (UTC)
mecurtin: Daniel agrees reading is fundamental (reading)
From: [personal profile] mecurtin
I'm not sure if you understood the last section of the book the same way I did.

I understood Robb to be saying that Dupin and Holmes are *intentionally* written as homosexuals, with the evidence present as subtext -- coded, inexplicit. For both characters, their homosexuality is a "Purloined Letter" -- the secret that is in plain sight, if you only look.

I took Robb also to be saying that both Poe and Doyle, more-or-less straight men, were fascinated to meet homosexuals and try to understand their superpower: gaydar. Dupin and Poe's detective abilities are the textual transformation of gaydar. Holmes tells Watson, "You see, but you do not observe"; gaydar is the type specimen of this kind of observation.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

Queering Holmes

July 2010

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18 1920212223 24
25 262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 30th, 2025 06:42 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios